Another horror story: US customs searches
#1
Posted 24 February 2008 - 11:50 AM
#2
Posted 24 February 2008 - 05:24 PM
I heard another horror story the other day about a gay tourist returning from a holiday in Thailand two weeks ago and being subjected to an hour-long search of his luggage and computer at Immigration in the US. The tourist is about 65, visits Thailand regularly and has never had anything illegal more serious than a traffic ticket. He was travelling alone and when he passed through customs carrying his laptop and luggage, they took him to a small private office, searched his luggage from top to bottom and spent over 30 minutes going through his lap top. They asked him why he goes to Thailand and he said for holiday. When they found nothing illegal in his luggage or laptop, they said he could go with no apologies for the delay.
Sounds about standard for Los Angeles..
john
Tired Old Queen
Dont feed the trolls, Dont feed the trolls, I keep telling myself Dont feed .....................
#4
Posted 24 February 2008 - 09:29 PM
#5
Posted 25 February 2008 - 02:00 AM
It's really is quite horrible to consider such harrassment of people doing nothing but travel. Does anyone know if they target all single males from SE Asia or Thailand or whether this has an anti-gay undertone.
Any unattached male is profiled for additional questioning. They are looking for evidence of under-age pornography and/or drugs. If you say if have visited northern Thailand, CM, Chiang Rai, Golden Triangle, then expect additional questioning or searches.
#6
Posted 25 February 2008 - 05:54 AM
Sounds about standard for Los Angeles..
john
Passed through Los Angles one month ago and not a single question. Well except when I listed "socks" as the only items I purchased in Thailand. Those cute, multi-colored socks that look like sneakers that the boys at Happy wear. The agent just laughed when I told him. But Customs/Immigration was a mob scene so maybe they just wanted to process the mob rapidly.
#7
Posted 25 February 2008 - 08:48 AM
Any unattached male is profiled for additional questioning.
I, an unattached male carrying his laptop and a passport full of Thailand stamps, passed through LA again yesterday and only received a "welcome home" comment - the same treatment I've received the 14 or 15 other times I've entered the states from Thailand through LAX. A few years back, I do remember one of the immigration officers asking me one or two questions about the weather in LOS but that was about it.
While standing in line Saturday, I noticed many other "unattached" males ahead of me and I saw nobody getting the third degree about anything.
#8
Posted 25 February 2008 - 09:19 AM
#9
Posted 25 February 2008 - 12:23 PM
Can you volunteer for the body-cavity search?
#10
Posted 26 February 2008 - 02:01 AM
I, an unattached male carrying his laptop and a passport full of Thailand stamps, passed through LA again yesterday and only received a "welcome home" comment - the same treatment I've received the 14 or 15 other times I've entered the states from Thailand through LAX. A few years back, I do remember one of the immigration officers asking me one or two questions about the weather in LOS but that was about it.
While standing in line Saturday, I noticed many other "unattached" males ahead of me and I saw nobody getting the third degree about anything.
I did and I was told I was a single male with Thailand on my itinerary. They told me they were looking for evidence of child pornography and/or drugs. These more frequent seaches started after 2003 with passage of Bush's law that makes it a federal crime for a U.S. citizen to travel overseas for the purpose or intent of having sex with persons under the age of 18.
#11
Posted 26 February 2008 - 09:23 AM
#12
Posted 26 February 2008 - 09:44 AM
I only download music and movies from Itunes as they tried once to question where all my 800 GB of music came from. I showed them the file for the receipts and told the supervisor that everything on the computer was legal and receipts to show it all were in this file. He asked why I spent so much money on music and I said that since USA started taking freedoms away from their citizens that I know Immigrations would try to get you for anything they could so I make sure all I have on my possession is legal and they will never find anything in my luggage that is illegal. He waved me through but they don’t like the idea that some save receipts to answer their questions. The last few times, I have just sat down and read a book and not stood there waiting for their questions. They much prefer to keep you on edge and the reading a book as soon as you are flagged and looking like you don’t give a shit really does get them.
I have been to Brazil and Europe a few times last year and am rarely stopped coming back from there. I understand the need to keep terrorist out of the country. But, for citizens who are residents to loose all freedoms when they enter back into the USA I find horrible and I don’t think it will stop soon.
#13
Posted 26 February 2008 - 10:39 AM
Actually, it's probably nowhere near as bad today as it's been in the past, when customs officials routinely confiscated written materials for their written contents, in flagrant violation of the First Amendment. For example, it was common in the early days of the womens' reproductive rights movement led by Margaret Sanger, among others, for border police to seize not only condoms from luggage, but to confiscate all books or pamphlets relating to any means of birth control, which were labelled "obscene." The same rule applied to a seemingly endless list of books or writings that were considered obscene, subversive or seditious.
It hasn't only been the Americans. DH Lawrence's classic "Lady Chatterley's Lover" has probably been seized by more customs officials around the world than any other book in history, including Canada, Australia, the UK and USA. Those days are now thankfully gone, as most courts have decided that virtually all written materials are to be protected as an integral part of free speech, even at Customs. JPEG's on your computer are another matter, at least for now.
One of these days, or generations, an enlightened US Supreme Court is going to ask anew the question of why a US citizen exercising his established constitutional rights to travel abroad, should be subject to searches and seizures on his return which virtually every court in America would find constitutionally "unreasonable" if they occurred inside the country. Just don't hold your breath waiting for that decision, given the current composition of the Court.
.
#14
Posted 26 February 2008 - 10:55 AM
One of these days, or generations, an enlightened US Supreme Court is going to ask anew the question of why a US citizen exercising his constitutional rights to travelling abroad, should be subject to searches and seizures on his return which virtually every court in America would find constitutionally "unreasonable" if they occurred inside the country. Just don't hold your breath waiting for that decision, given the current composition of the Court.
To me, this is the number 1 issue I case my vote. For years, I have voted on the candidate with whom I think will most protect my rights by nominating Supreme Court justices who will protect all of my freedoms. Unfortunately, with the current makeup it, it is not going to be changed in one or two elections as the current makeup of the court was put into place by aggressive religious conservative campaigning.
#15
Posted 27 February 2008 - 01:27 AM
#16
Posted 27 February 2008 - 02:11 AM
#17
Posted 27 February 2008 - 07:26 AM
.... Actually, it's probably nowhere near as bad today as it's been in the past, when customs officials routinely confiscated written materials for their written contents, in flagrant violation of the First Amendment. For example, it was common in the early days of the womens' reproductive rights movement led by Margaret Sanger, among others, for border police to seize not only condoms from luggage, but to confiscate all books or pamphlets relating to any means of birth control, which were labelled "obscene." The same rule applied to a seemingly endless list of books or writings that were considered obscene, subversive or seditious.
It's heartening to know that the Land of the Free has so much in common with South Africa's apartheid regime which banned a number of classic books; in 1955, for instance, the New York Times reported that Mary Shelley's Frankenstein was banned there as "indecent, objectionable, or obscene". At one time, the regime also reportedly banned Anna Sewell's Black Beauty, being stupidly unaware that it was a story about a horse.













