Someone made a comment in another thread today that a certain bar could be a lot of fun "especially after a few drinks."
I wonder if you are one of those people who finds the gogo bars not much fun unless you have been fortified with wine at dinner or something more exotic before you hit the night life.
I'm also one of those people who hates to walk into a gogo bar alone, no matter how fortified I may be.
I've always wondered if that shows that I'm still too inhibited after all these years living here, or is there something else at work here that makes me want to be high and with company when I go bar hopping.
0
"especially after a few drinks."
Started by DollyLamma, Nov 14 2006 05:02 PM
49 replies to this topic
#2 Guest_pearl69er_*
-
- Guests
Posted 14 November 2006 - 05:37 PM
I doubt you are alone in that feeling. In fact walking into most nightspots-let alone go-go bars can be a lonely experience. Mind you, at least in Thailand you will have many new instant friends.
__________________
Editor's NOTE: I would like to repeat for the second time in two days to this poster : PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE the previous post in toto in your post when it can be so easily read in the original.
All you are doing is cluttering up the thread for no good reason and using valuable space. Final warning.
__________________
Editor's NOTE: I would like to repeat for the second time in two days to this poster : PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE the previous post in toto in your post when it can be so easily read in the original.
All you are doing is cluttering up the thread for no good reason and using valuable space. Final warning.
#3
-
- Members
-
- 1,017 posts
Veteran
Posted 14 November 2006 - 07:28 PM
QUOTE
I wonder what percentage of farangs retired to Pattaya or Bangkok have a serious problem with alcohol or other substance abuse.
I wonder what percentage of posts made on these boards after midnight, poster time, are PUI ( Posting under the influence ).
#4
-
- Members
-
- 508 posts
Veteran
Posted 15 November 2006 - 06:46 AM
It was I, Francois, who wrote that quote about "fun especially after a few drinks". As a rather timide person I find a few drinks brings the devil out in me which is only natural in Sin City.
Unfortunately beaucoup drinks makes the spirt willing but the flesh weak which makes for an "unhappy ending" at the end of the evening.
Unfortunately beaucoup drinks makes the spirt willing but the flesh weak which makes for an "unhappy ending" at the end of the evening.
#5
-
- Members
-
- 3,742 posts
Veteran
Posted 15 November 2006 - 10:46 AM
QUOTE
I wonder what percentage of posts made on these boards after midnight, poster time, are PUI ( Posting under the influence ).
I suspect that some "problem posters" become high risks of that tiresome phenomenon, as the level of the gin bottle falls.
Perhaps some entrepreneur will invent a keyboard with a built-in breathalizer that will prevent some drunken posters from TUI ( typing under the influence).
I enjoyed Francois' comments about getting juiced to bring out the devil, only to find that it leaves you a very limp Imp.
#6 Guest_pearl69er_*
-
- Guests
Posted 15 November 2006 - 11:02 AM
I'm sure you mean "to" in your damning post Mr Moderator, and not inferring I wear a tutu even after midnight or when I am drunk.
Your point about not including previous posts is aknowledged and filed in my mind even though I see it is a selective request rather than a rule that applies to all.
I am happy to oblige.
Your point about not including previous posts is aknowledged and filed in my mind even though I see it is a selective request rather than a rule that applies to all.
I am happy to oblige.
#7
-
- Members
-
- 298 posts
Veteran
Posted 15 November 2006 - 11:36 AM
even the moderator is against you, pearly mason.. oh, what a cruel world this is... 
#8 Guest_pearl69er_*
-
- Guests
Posted 15 November 2006 - 11:51 AM
Yes-so it may seem village idiot !. But it's like being lashed with a feather and has about as much effect.
#9
-
- Members
-
- 1,221 posts
Veteran
Posted 15 November 2006 - 12:41 PM
QUOTE
I enjoyed Francois' comments about getting juiced to bring out the devil, only to find that it leaves you a very limp Imp
Don't laugh, but this "limp imp" problem can be serious for older guys. What do you do when you need some liquid courage to even consider going to bed with a 19 years old boy but the same liquid makes it impossible to do the things you want to do to him !!!!
#11
-
- Members
-
- 103 posts
Veteran
Posted 15 November 2006 - 05:07 PM
Wow, you really are a bunch of nasty nasty old bitches! Stinky smelly old queen witches! I like it, I like it a whole lot!
Pearly, the moderator has really smacked you down, she’s ripped you right across ya big fat moaning gob, and so publicly too. How degrading, how humiliating for you! It’s certainly not balanced! Look’s like she’s playing favorities, and you ain’t it! Lol! When I’m reading all youse nasty bitch-slapping comments, skanky old whitches, I like pinching my big pink moist teats. Yesh, gets me going
Pearly, the moderator has really smacked you down, she’s ripped you right across ya big fat moaning gob, and so publicly too. How degrading, how humiliating for you! It’s certainly not balanced! Look’s like she’s playing favorities, and you ain’t it! Lol! When I’m reading all youse nasty bitch-slapping comments, skanky old whitches, I like pinching my big pink moist teats. Yesh, gets me going
#12
-
- Members
-
- 1,686 posts
Veteran
Posted 15 November 2006 - 05:27 PM
Have the moderators given any thought to a new dress code ?
Hehehe......
Hehehe......
#13 Guest_pearl69er_*
-
- Guests
Posted 15 November 2006 - 07:05 PM
I don't know how public it was old sloppy-given the number of readers on this board.
#14
-
- Members
-
- 1,972 posts
Veteran
Posted 15 November 2006 - 07:36 PM
QUOTE(pearl69er @ Nov 15 2006, 04:02 AM) 
I'm sure you mean "to" in your damning post Mr Moderator
In toto - DEFINITION - adv. - as a whole - ORIGIN, Latin. Source: Concise Oxford English Dictionary.
I am surprised that you, as a barrack-room lawyer, didn't even know the meaning of this Latin phrase which is in common usage. Dummy
p/s Just in case you, as an Aussie, don't know what a barrack-room lawyer is (again from the OED) -
"a person who makes authoritative-sounding pronouncements on subjects in which they are not qualified".
"Go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence...Speak your truth quietly and clearly..."
"Desiderata" (1927), Max Ehrmann (1872-1945).
"Desiderata" (1927), Max Ehrmann (1872-1945).
#15 Guest_pearl69er_*
-
- Guests
Posted 15 November 2006 - 11:32 PM
Yes, and this is one "barrack room lawyer" who made you back down and change your post exactly as I predicted you would .
.
#16
-
- Members
-
- 1,972 posts
Veteran
Posted 16 November 2006 - 12:19 AM
QUOTE(pearl69er @ Nov 15 2006, 04:32 PM)
Yes, and this is one "barrack room lawyer" who made you back down and change your post exactly as I predicted you would
.At least you now admit that you are a barrack-room lawyer as defined in my prvious post. Now we are getting somewhere!
I hate to disappoint you but I HAVE NOT backed down NOR HAVE I CHANGED any of my posts. In the unlieky event that I would contemplate backing down, as you call it, I can assure you it would not be as a result of anything you have done. Your prediction is therefore unfounded.
Pray tell which of my posts you claim I have changed (if you can), or are you still living in the fantasy world which you have created for yourself.
"Go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence...Speak your truth quietly and clearly..."
"Desiderata" (1927), Max Ehrmann (1872-1945).
"Desiderata" (1927), Max Ehrmann (1872-1945).
#17 Guest_ear wig_*
-
- Guests
Posted 16 November 2006 - 02:12 AM
All this rubbish about being slapped by the moderator, what the moderator does not understand is some people only read the odd thread and do not go to all posts left here so is ok for the few who hang on to every word some of the star writers like perl69er write and love to see them spanked but in reality its what is written that counts.
Its just a shame just a couple of the multi handle flamers have to continue to write nasty thing because all we want to do is give useful information the problem is you have to spend so much time defending your self and you cant just leave it you have to jump on them or they will not stop.
Why these catty idiots cant go and book into a clinic some where i notice hedda has now had her knuckles wrapped so she is licking her back room home.
fair enough if you delete when the flamers get so frustrated they have to insult some one to the max because they dont take any notice of all there other tirades but not because some one is just making a point.
Its just a shame just a couple of the multi handle flamers have to continue to write nasty thing because all we want to do is give useful information the problem is you have to spend so much time defending your self and you cant just leave it you have to jump on them or they will not stop.
Why these catty idiots cant go and book into a clinic some where i notice hedda has now had her knuckles wrapped so she is licking her back room home.
fair enough if you delete when the flamers get so frustrated they have to insult some one to the max because they dont take any notice of all there other tirades but not because some one is just making a point.
#18 Guest_pearl69er_*
-
- Guests
Posted 16 November 2006 - 07:39 AM
It's "unlieky event" that I would re-print your previous libellous statement Mr Snowjob as I would be compounding them. They may have magically disappeared as the moderator finally saw good sense but they have been recorded eleswhere for posterity.
who pressed the delete button is imaterial.
Nor do I claim to be a lawyer but as plenty of people in Pattaya know, I have been involved in media and publishing for 40 years and the nature of my job involved sitting in on meetings with solicitors who specialised in libel (and who ocassionally get it wong). so one tends to pick up a working knowledge of the subject.
I and a well known Pattaya resident have also sued one of the world's most famous publications who caved in within a week, apologised in the High Court of London and we were paid substantial damages and given a front page apology.
I have also personally sued one of Britains gay publications but dropped the action after pleadings from a group of influential gay businessmen who said it would send the publication broke and deprive the communty of a voice-so settled for a printed retraction.
Not everyone who posts on this board makes flippant statements and I do not in this matter and as I said previously to the moderator, despite his apparent angry attitude: it was done for the best intentions. It is not me who would suffer any damage.
Therefore I would urge anyone using internet chat boards to err on the side of caution. It is not as annonymous as many think and several precedents have been set since the first - the Joseph Gutnick case in 2000 and I will quote from an interview with man :
Last year, Joe Gutnick won a landmark High Court defamation case against the newswire Dow Jones, which published material from an article in the US business journal, Barons on the internet.
It was the world's first finding that a publisher could be sued for material on the web which had its origins in another country, and Joe Gutnick hailed it as a positive development.
JOE GUTNICK: Well, they'll have to be very careful what they put on the net and we knew that previously, but it will certainly be re-established that the net is no different than a regular newspaper, that you have to be careful what you write and if you offend somebody or write malicious statements about people, like was done in my case, then you can be subject to being prosecuted.
You can take this information, fulminate about it, post another nasty retort as I don't really care but I suggest you join the Village Idiot in his wild goose chase for sociopaths as that maybe more rewarding for you.
nb: it was indeed clever of you to pick up my mistake in questioning the moderators use of a word-that is why in the publishing business we have sub-editors as no-one is infallible ( except Hedda) including the several top selling authors I know.
who pressed the delete button is imaterial.
Nor do I claim to be a lawyer but as plenty of people in Pattaya know, I have been involved in media and publishing for 40 years and the nature of my job involved sitting in on meetings with solicitors who specialised in libel (and who ocassionally get it wong). so one tends to pick up a working knowledge of the subject.
I and a well known Pattaya resident have also sued one of the world's most famous publications who caved in within a week, apologised in the High Court of London and we were paid substantial damages and given a front page apology.
I have also personally sued one of Britains gay publications but dropped the action after pleadings from a group of influential gay businessmen who said it would send the publication broke and deprive the communty of a voice-so settled for a printed retraction.
Not everyone who posts on this board makes flippant statements and I do not in this matter and as I said previously to the moderator, despite his apparent angry attitude: it was done for the best intentions. It is not me who would suffer any damage.
Therefore I would urge anyone using internet chat boards to err on the side of caution. It is not as annonymous as many think and several precedents have been set since the first - the Joseph Gutnick case in 2000 and I will quote from an interview with man :
Last year, Joe Gutnick won a landmark High Court defamation case against the newswire Dow Jones, which published material from an article in the US business journal, Barons on the internet.
It was the world's first finding that a publisher could be sued for material on the web which had its origins in another country, and Joe Gutnick hailed it as a positive development.
JOE GUTNICK: Well, they'll have to be very careful what they put on the net and we knew that previously, but it will certainly be re-established that the net is no different than a regular newspaper, that you have to be careful what you write and if you offend somebody or write malicious statements about people, like was done in my case, then you can be subject to being prosecuted.
You can take this information, fulminate about it, post another nasty retort as I don't really care but I suggest you join the Village Idiot in his wild goose chase for sociopaths as that maybe more rewarding for you.
nb: it was indeed clever of you to pick up my mistake in questioning the moderators use of a word-that is why in the publishing business we have sub-editors as no-one is infallible ( except Hedda) including the several top selling authors I know.
#19
-
- Members
-
- 11 posts
Member
Posted 16 November 2006 - 08:13 AM
For many people, enjoying a gogo bar or any form of entertainment can be equally fun with or without a drink. If drinks, drugs, etc. are needed before you can be comfortable in participating in an activity, you may be inhibited and or have some other psychological problems. Needing a drink, heavy drinking and alcoholisim is a symptom of underlying problems. The problem may or may not be serious. But, if alcohol controls your life, my hunch would be that a problem exists and that problem should be addressed before alcohol kills the enjoyment of life and finally kills you.
#20
-
- Members
-
- 280 posts
Veteran
Posted 16 November 2006 - 09:43 AM
QUOTE
They may have magically disappeared as the moderator finally saw good sense but they have been recorded eleswhere for posterity.
If that's a suggestion that one of this board's moderators altered or edited a post by Snowy to cause it to 'magically disappear", then the suggestion is itself potentially libelous - and categorically wrong.
The subject thread was closed to preserve the record, not change it. If the subject poster thinks otherwise, then please send to us by private message the text which you claim was altered by a moderator and kept by you for posterity.
Failing that submission, or a public apology, your resignation from the board will be accepted. This statement has been authorized by the owner, Bahtstop.
#21 Guest_pearl69er_*
-
- Guests
Posted 16 November 2006 - 02:32 PM
Libelious ?
you got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning Mod 1 if you believe what I have said is libellious. You apparently don't have a clue what you are talking about :
However: it now appears that I misread the wrong thread and indeed the highly libellous staements do remain and for your own informationI shall re-print them here : ( and apologise for making a mistake in assuming a moderator or Snowpea didn't have the good sense to delete the following words) . I do not claim to be infallible nor do I need to be. The owner of Baht-Stop unfortunately must be if he wishes to be a publisher .
The offending words are highlighted and I emphasis : They are still on this board and by me re-printing them for you because of your obvious oversight in not deleting them I take no responsibilty : that rsponsibilty lies with the author of the words and the publisher of Baht-Stop. If the owner of Baht-Stop chooses to allow them to stay, then he has a serious problem:
**********************************
quote :
Earwig
"I don't know about all this talk of pedos some people are obsessed with them, you would think your tripping over them in Pattaya, when the truth is some write on here condemning, when its obvious there saying, "look at me I say bad things about pedos, I cant possible one" what a joke. Its so obvious what there gane is.
Come on guys concentrate on Interesting things that are happening in Thailand, not all this bitchy nastiness from a few sickos
end quote.
************************************
quote:
Snowy
"And that last sentence is coming from one of the biggest semi-illiterate bitches around - what a pity you don't practice what you preach!
As for talk of sickos and pedos - you seem to be the No.1 defender of paedophilia in Sunee Plaza - why are YOU so obsessed with that subject? - are you one of them?
end quote.
***************************************
If you as moderator and the owner of Bhat Stop cannot see the libel then you are sillier than I believe you are.
I also re-print Earwig's post from my thread about libel:
quote:
Earwig :
"Yes I can not say to much as the matter is in the hands of my Bangkok lawyers same ones who tracked down Gloria and fined him successfully, but its ok Im use to these couple of flamers, we have so far found out the bitter person wrote this from an Internet shop in Sunee plaza and we also have a court order and are looking to seize the computer concerned
We also know who this catty person is so its only a matter of time, before this sicko is where he should be in Prison, they seem to think there is no retribution in Thailand soon a few will know.
I think it is bad that this forum Owner let the offending post stayed so long I have had so many emails its blocking my computer mail box.."
end quote.
************************************
Clearly you and the owner are amateur publishers and have failed to take notice of advice offered to you sincerely.
Boot me off if you want- I never resign from anything and take no notice of such childish pomposity as your suggestion to-and particulalry when I am correct-.
The owner of Baht-Stop must be a very rich man if he alLows it to remain and he obviously has no fear of a Thai prison or Thai defamation laws ( some of the easiest in the world in the proof of libel that is required). If he lives abroad, then he must not care about his immigration status in visiting Thailand for if a judgement were entered against him in Thailand he can kiss goodbye to visiting the country.
Scoff at me , treat me as a joke, call me a "flamer, troll , hydra" or any of the other silly words posters use but I am right...and you sir..are very seriously wrong.
Earwig has contacted me by email following my 'libel thread' but I don't know which country he lives in. However if he is on Thailand he can sue there-if he is in another country he can sue there and would easily get a judgement entered against the poster and website owner. Such jugements can then eventually be enforced in Thailand. You obviously took no notice of the limited research I posted that you demanded and you seem to be approaching this matter as though it is a battle of wits or a game that one can win.
The damage has now be done and you have drawn attention to it and continue to compund that damage by not removing the offending post. As the numbers of readers of these posts rise, so does the seriousness.
( don't take my word though-ask a lawyer)
you got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning Mod 1 if you believe what I have said is libellious. You apparently don't have a clue what you are talking about :
However: it now appears that I misread the wrong thread and indeed the highly libellous staements do remain and for your own informationI shall re-print them here : ( and apologise for making a mistake in assuming a moderator or Snowpea didn't have the good sense to delete the following words) . I do not claim to be infallible nor do I need to be. The owner of Baht-Stop unfortunately must be if he wishes to be a publisher .
The offending words are highlighted and I emphasis : They are still on this board and by me re-printing them for you because of your obvious oversight in not deleting them I take no responsibilty : that rsponsibilty lies with the author of the words and the publisher of Baht-Stop. If the owner of Baht-Stop chooses to allow them to stay, then he has a serious problem:
**********************************
quote :
Earwig
"I don't know about all this talk of pedos some people are obsessed with them, you would think your tripping over them in Pattaya, when the truth is some write on here condemning, when its obvious there saying, "look at me I say bad things about pedos, I cant possible one" what a joke. Its so obvious what there gane is.
Come on guys concentrate on Interesting things that are happening in Thailand, not all this bitchy nastiness from a few sickos
end quote.
************************************
quote:
Snowy
"And that last sentence is coming from one of the biggest semi-illiterate bitches around - what a pity you don't practice what you preach!
As for talk of sickos and pedos - you seem to be the No.1 defender of paedophilia in Sunee Plaza - why are YOU so obsessed with that subject? - are you one of them?
end quote.
***************************************
If you as moderator and the owner of Bhat Stop cannot see the libel then you are sillier than I believe you are.
I also re-print Earwig's post from my thread about libel:
quote:
Earwig :
"Yes I can not say to much as the matter is in the hands of my Bangkok lawyers same ones who tracked down Gloria and fined him successfully, but its ok Im use to these couple of flamers, we have so far found out the bitter person wrote this from an Internet shop in Sunee plaza and we also have a court order and are looking to seize the computer concerned
We also know who this catty person is so its only a matter of time, before this sicko is where he should be in Prison, they seem to think there is no retribution in Thailand soon a few will know.
I think it is bad that this forum Owner let the offending post stayed so long I have had so many emails its blocking my computer mail box.."
end quote.
************************************
Clearly you and the owner are amateur publishers and have failed to take notice of advice offered to you sincerely.
Boot me off if you want- I never resign from anything and take no notice of such childish pomposity as your suggestion to-and particulalry when I am correct-.
The owner of Baht-Stop must be a very rich man if he alLows it to remain and he obviously has no fear of a Thai prison or Thai defamation laws ( some of the easiest in the world in the proof of libel that is required). If he lives abroad, then he must not care about his immigration status in visiting Thailand for if a judgement were entered against him in Thailand he can kiss goodbye to visiting the country.
Scoff at me , treat me as a joke, call me a "flamer, troll , hydra" or any of the other silly words posters use but I am right...and you sir..are very seriously wrong.
Earwig has contacted me by email following my 'libel thread' but I don't know which country he lives in. However if he is on Thailand he can sue there-if he is in another country he can sue there and would easily get a judgement entered against the poster and website owner. Such jugements can then eventually be enforced in Thailand. You obviously took no notice of the limited research I posted that you demanded and you seem to be approaching this matter as though it is a battle of wits or a game that one can win.
The damage has now be done and you have drawn attention to it and continue to compund that damage by not removing the offending post. As the numbers of readers of these posts rise, so does the seriousness.
( don't take my word though-ask a lawyer)
#22
-
- Members
-
- 1,686 posts
Veteran
Posted 16 November 2006 - 04:43 PM
QUOTE
...and apologise for making a mistake in assuming a moderator or Snowpea didn't have the good sense to delete the following words
Some apology. It not only makes no sense, it shows no class as well.
Hehehe.....
#23
-
- Members
-
- 496 posts
Veteran
Posted 16 November 2006 - 05:01 PM
QUOTE
I never resign from anything
No kidding.
I would be embarrassed and humiliated to write the post you just made.
If you had an ounce of self-respect or decency, you would have offered a direct apology to the board for making what you clearly admit was a mistaken claim that someone had deleted something.
You read the wrong thread, accused the moderator of deleting something in another thread, and now you don't even have the courtesy to give a straight apology.
Instead, you post even more crap. What is your problem ? If it were my board, I'd bounce you back to the hole you crawled out from.
#24
-
- Root Admin
-
- 59 posts
Administrator
Posted 16 November 2006 - 05:42 PM
QUOTE
I never resign from anything
I just did it for you.
We all make mistakes and, in your case, you made a mistaken claim that we had deleted things from the board, as if there had been something to hide or erase. You were wrong. You now admit that.
A simple "I'm sorry" would have been enough, but you tried to use your own mistaken claim as an excuse to launch another insulting attack on the board.
I don't understand how anyone can post the kind of threats you have been posting here, clearly trying to intimate the discussion of certain subjects, accuse us of something that you then admit you were mistaken about, but then use those mistakes as a pretext to further attack and unsult the board.
There are words for that kind of behavior where I come from, but I won't be so uncivil as to use them here. One of those words, however, is certainly not a "member-in-good-standing." The name Pearl69er has been deleted as a member of this board.
#25
-
- Members
-
- 3,742 posts
Veteran
Posted 16 November 2006 - 06:53 PM
I have already informed the moderators in private that I don't agree with the deletion of this membership, not because Pearl69 has not shown the most abominable lack of taste in posting, but because I would have suspended this member's posting privileges until he calms down and recognizes the need to extend a sincere and unqualified apology for making unfounded charges.
I do recognize, however, the distinct possibility that no amount of cooling off would be likely to change the demeanor of a poster who may well have been invented and planted as a member here to simply make trouble.
On reflection, whether I fully agree with the remedy chosen here to deal with this poster is not as important as the board's demonstration that it has the will not to be intimidated by the virtual bullies who prowl these boards. To that degree, the board is probably much stronger with this one less member.
I do recognize, however, the distinct possibility that no amount of cooling off would be likely to change the demeanor of a poster who may well have been invented and planted as a member here to simply make trouble.
On reflection, whether I fully agree with the remedy chosen here to deal with this poster is not as important as the board's demonstration that it has the will not to be intimidated by the virtual bullies who prowl these boards. To that degree, the board is probably much stronger with this one less member.
