8 replies to this topic

[Lucas]

I am not sure if this has been discussed.
Is it maybe of any ones interest if the price of a short-time should be valued considering the weight of the client ?

[Bob]

I'm reminded of the Saturday Night Live regular contributions by Jack Handey called Deep Thoughts....

A couple of Handey's contributions:

I hope if dogs ever take over the world, and they chose a king, they don't
just go by size, because I bet there are some Chihuahuas with some good ideas.


A good way to threaten somebody is to light a stick of dynamite. Then you call
the guy and hold the burning fuse up to the phone. "Hear that?" you say.
"That's dynamite, baby."

[Lucas]

.



[i][b] they don't
just go by size,
[/quote]


Yes tell that to those Pattaya Size Queens Expats.

I myself is well shaped and would not be happy if the boys would charge by the size.
I am sure I had 2pay 5000 baht a time.

Me with my sexy body would go for pay by weight.

What about you ?

[Bob]

Sorry, I'm still in deep thought....

[Bob]

or by the inch?

Receiving or giving?

[wpcoe]

Receiving or giving?

I thought he meant waistline inches...

[Bob]

I thought he meant waistline inches...

Heck, maybe he did. I have a dirty mind.

[gay_grampa]

I am not sure if this has been discussed.
Is it maybe of any ones interest if the price of a short-time should be valued considering the weight of the client ?

Some airlines are already doing that ( Scotsman 23 April 2009 ).
Maybe massage boys should charge by the acreage of flesh that has to be pummelled, oiled or groped?

[Hedda]

Maybe massage boys should charge by the acreage of flesh that has to be pummelled, oiled or groped?

I can just see the signs at the massage parlors:"Fat surcharge: 50 Baht"